A persistent claim in university hiring and admissions is that equity displaces merit and weakens excellence. This false binary casts candidates from underrepresented groups as less meritorious or deserving and enables their appointment or admissions to be dismissed as “diversity hires” while presuming dominant-group candidates were selected on merit. This assumption is neither neutral nor supported by evidence. It ignores how familiarity, institutional advantage, and unequal opportunity shape both the candidate field and judgments about it. The claim also misconstrues how merit is produced, recognized and attributed through these processes.Â
Universities must uphold academic and professional standards and meet human rights and equality obligations. This requires more than applying criteria uniformly. Institutions decide where to search, which achievements count, what their criteria measure and how evidence of accomplishment and potential are interpreted. Equity strengthens excellence when it makes those judgments more accurate, relevant, and rigorous.Â
Excellence is the demonstrated and prospective capacity to succeed in a position or program and contribute to its purposes. Committees infer it from academic performance, scholarly contributions, references and interviews, whose value depends on what they measure, and how they were produced and interpreted. A credible claim to merit therefore requires scrutiny at three interconnected stages: how the field is formed, what the criteria measure, and how achievement and potential are recognized.Â
Read the complete article
